Antipsychotic drugs as a contributing factor of pulmonary embolism: A report of 4 cases.

Pulmonary embolism is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death in the world after stroke and heart attack; several factors have been identified, and it has been reported that antipsychotic drugs increase the risk of pulmonary embolism. It is a brief communication reporting the case of 4 patients under antipsychotic drugs, were hospitalized in the intensive care unit of cardiology in Mohammed VI hospital center for the management of pulmonary embolism. All the etiological investigations performed including SARS COV2 viral serologies with PCR, tumor markers, chest-abdomen-pelvis CT angiogram scan, phthisiology, thrombophilia tests, and lower limbs echo Doppler returned without any notable findings, and the evolution was positive after anticoagulation and stopping antipsychotics.

The Efficacy and Safety of Prolonged Oral Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients Recovered From COVID-19 1 Year After Hospital Discharge: The SARCOV-19 Prospective Registry.

Our objective in this study is to know the predictors of thromboembolic events 1 year after hospitalization for severe COVID-19 and the benefit of preventive oral anticoagulation for 1 month to placebo after release. We conducted a prospective study to determine the benefit of preventive anticoagulation upon discharge from the hospital and to determine the predictive factors of thromboembolic events. We included 720 patients in the SARCOV-19 Registry, with a mean age of 62.07 (±18.11), and 61.1% male. After 1 year, 60 thromboembolic events were observed, 45 in patients on a placebo, and 15 in patients on a direct oral anticoagulant. The predictive factors determined for these events were the presence of cardiac disease, elevation of D-dimer during hospitalization, myocardial damage defined by elevation of troponins more than 6 times normal, and the use of mechanical ventilation. However, the use of preventive anticoagulation protects against thrombotic events and reduces the risk of a thromboembolic event at 1 year with a relative risk of 0.49 compared to a placebo. The prolongation of the preventive anticoagulation at the exit will protect with a decrease of almost 50% of the risk against thrombotic events and this without increasing the risk of bleeding.

The Impact of Prior Antithrombotic use on Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Severe COVID-19 Infection.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective in this study was to determine the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications in patients with previous heart disease and severe covid-19 infection and the impact of previous use of antithrombotics on protection against these complications. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 158 patients with heart disease admitted to an intensive care unit for severe SARS-COV-2 infection. In order to determine the predictive factors, we used logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 158 patients, 22 were complicated by a thrombo-embolic event (13.9%), mean age of our population 64.03 (SD = 15.27), with a male predominance of 98 (62%). For the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications, and after multivariate analysis, we find the short duration of hospitalization (OR = 0.92; 95%CI (0.863-0.983), P = .014, previous use of antithrombotic drugs ((OR = 0.288, 95%CI (0.091-0.911), P = .034 for antiplatelet agents) and (OR = 0.322, 95% CI (0, 131-0.851), P = .021) for anticoagulants) as protective factors, and admission thrombocytosis as a risk factor (OR = 4.58, 95%CI (1.2-10.627), P = .021). D-dimer was not detected as a risk factor, and this can be explained by the characteristics of our population. Although prior use of antithrombotic drugs protects against thromboembolic complications during severe infection, there was no benefit in mortality. CONCLUSION: Prior use of antithrombotic drugs is a protective factor against thromboembolic complications in patients with a history of heart disease but without effect on mortality.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction in a young patient after Covid 19 vaccination: a case report

We report the case of a 23 years old patient who developed an acute myocardial infarction one day after his second dose of COVID-19 BIBP vaccination, complicated by severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction measured at 32%, associated with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities well evolved under treatment of heart failure with reduced EF combining :angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, beta blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Coronary arteries were normal at angiography suggesting initially the diagnostic of myocarditis. Therefore, a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed to confirm the latter, which showed an image consistent with a recent left ventricular subendocardial infarction, remarkably prominent in the left anterior descending artery territory and the absence of signs of myocarditis. The patient had no previous past medical history or other clinical features explaining this coronary event onset. Thus, the vaccine was potentially to be implicated in the pathophysiology of the event. Overall, complications associated with COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare, and their benefit is well established. That's why they continue to be recommended by public health experts despite of their rare side effects.

Massive pulmonary embolism with ST-segment elevation mimicking an isolated right ventricular myocardial infarction in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia: Case report.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a great simulator; It mimics step by step its main differential diagnosis which is myocardial infarction. Its clinical and electrical manifestations are unspecific. Rarely, an ST-segment elevation can occur making the diagnosis more difficult. Recognizing such an uncommon electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern is of an important relevance to lead to a prompt and suitable therapeutic management. In our paper, we discuss a 68 years-old man case who presents with dyspnea and chest pain with ST-segment elevation in V1, aVR, DIII, and right-sided leads suggestive of isolated right ventricular infarction, admitted in a stable hemodynamical status which rapidly deteriorated. Echocardiographic assessment has shown signs of acute pulmonary heart disease with the presence of the specific McConnell's sign. A computed tomography pulmonary angiogram was performed revealing massive bilateral PE that benefited from thrombolytic therapy with alteplase with a remarkable following and regression of the ST-segment elevation. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of massive PE presenting with these ECG findings in the context of COVID 19 pneumonia, of which practitioners should be aware to better orient diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Pericarditis complicating COVID-19 infection: a report of two cases.

COVID-19 infection is responsible for many complications, which can lead to a high risk of mortality. Respiratory manifestations are the most encountered, while that cardiovascular complications are classified as the most severe. We report two cases of COVID-19 infection complicated by pericarditis. In the absence of other etiology of pericarditis, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was considered as the behind cause. The treatment in these two cases was corticosteroids with colchicine, with good outcomes. In the presence of any cardiovascular symptoms, pericarditis related to COVID-19 should be suspected, in order to act swiftly and avoid complications as well as contamination.

Acute Myocardial Injury Assessed by High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin Predicting Severe Outcomes and Death in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac injury has been linked to a poor prognosis during COVID-19 disease. Nevertheless, the risk factors associated are yet to be thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare demographical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 with and without cardiac injury, to further investigate the prevalence of acute cardiac injury as well as its impact on their outcomes in COVID-19-patients. METHODS: We included in a retrospective analysis, all COVID-19 patients admitted between October first and December first, 2020, at the University Hospital Center of Oujda (Morocco) who underwent a troponin assay which was systematically measured on admission. The study population was divided into two groups: cardiac-injured patients and those without cardiac injury. Clinical, biological data and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 298 confirmed COVID-19 cases were included. Our study found that compared to non-cardiac-injured, cardiac-injured patients are older, with higher possibilities of existing comorbidities including hypertension (68 [42.2%] vs 40 [29.2%], P = 0.02), diabetes (81 [50.3%] vs 53 [38.7%] P = 0.044), the need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission and mortality. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis shows a significantly increased risk of death among cardiac-injured COVID-19-patients as compared to non-cardiac injured. (HR, 1.620 [CI 95%: 2.562-1.024]). CONCLUSION: Our retrospective cohort found that old age, comorbidities, a previous history of CAD, were significantly associated with acute cardiac injury. COVID-19 patients with acute cardiac injury are at a higher risk of ICU admission, and death.

Cardiogenic shock revealing myocarditis after mRNA vaccination against covid-19: Case report and brief review for the first case in Morocco.

INTRODUCTION: and importance: After its unexpected effectiveness in the clinical trials, the anti-COVID-19 vaccine type mRNA was launched on December 11, 2020, but a few months later, several reports of post-mRNA vaccination myocarditis were published, but without any proven causal link. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 14-year-old teenager admitted to the emergency department for a cardiogenic shock, the patient mentioned that he had an anti-COVID 19 vaccination 10 days before his admission. First, the vasoactive drugs had stabilized the patient; the troponins came back highly favorable but later confirmed myocarditis by magnetic resonance imaging. In this sense an etiological analysis was made and it came back without any particularities, leaving us relating the myocarditis to the vaccination. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Post-vaccination myocarditis is a rare event, with very few reports in the literature. After the introduction of COVID vaccination, several reports were published, mostly after the mRNA vaccine. Until now, no causal link has been proven, so we need to have more reports in this sense to have a better knowledge of this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Until we obtain a more precise explanation of the mechanism of myocarditis after vaccination with the anti-COVID-19 vaccine, all symptoms suggesting myocarditis should be systematically monitored during the first 7 days after vaccination.

Diagnostic Accuracy of D-Dimers for Predicting Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19-Patients.

IMPORTANCE: Proinflammatory and hypercoagulable states with marked elevation seen in D-Dimer levels have been accurately described in patients infected by the SARS- Cov2 even without pulmonary embolism (PE). OBJECTIVES: To compare D-dimers values in patients infected by the novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) with and without PE and to establish an optimal D-dimer cut-off to predict the occurrence of PE, which guides pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTPA) indication. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled all COVID-19-patients admitted between October first and November 22th, 2020, at the University Hospital Center of Mohammed VI, Oujda (Morocco), suspected to have PE and underwent a CTPA. Demographic characteristics and blood test results were compared between PE-positive and PE-negative. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to establish an optimal D-Dimer cut-off to predict the occurrence of PE. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 84 confirmed COVID-19-patients. The mean age was 64.93 years (SD 14.19). PE was diagnosed on CTPA in 31 (36.9%) patients. Clinical symptoms and in-hospital outcomes were similar in both groups except that more men had PE (p = .025). The median value of D-dimers in the group of patients with PE was significantly higher (14 680[IQR 33620-3450]ng/mL compared to the group of patients without PE 2980[IQR 6870-1600]ng/mL [P < .001]. A D-dimer at 2600 ng/mL was the optimal cut-off for predicting PE with a sensitivity of 90.3%, and AUC was .773[CI 95%, .667 -.876). CONCLUSION: A D-dimer cut-off value of 2600 ng/mL is a significant predictor of PE in COVID-19-patients with a sensitivity of 90.3%.

Association of pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome during COVID-19 infection: Case report and a brief review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: COVID 19 infection is considered a potentially serious disease since it is responsible for important respiratory and cardiovascular complications with a high morbid-mortality. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 54-year-old diabetic patient with hypertension who was admitted for heart failure with a reduced LVEF of 23% triggered by a pulmonary embolism and an acute coronary syndrome in the context of COVID-19 infection. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Indeed, these complications may be secondary to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable state as well as endothelial dysfunction caused by the vascular and systemic inflammation and cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2. Although the clinical polymorphism of COVID 19 infection is recognized, the association of myocardial ischemia with pulmonary embolism is uncommon and of adverse prognosis. This justifies a rapid and adapted multidisciplinary management. CONCLUSION: In the absence of contraindication, thromboprohylaxis should be initiated for all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications.

Massive pulmonary embolism complicating mild Covid 19 pneumonia: Successful systemic thrombolysis using rt-PA in an elderly patient: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: and importance: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is still a major health concern around the world, and its link with SARS Cov-2 has led to an increase in morbidity, mortality, and ICU hospitalizations. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 92-year-old man with no prior medical history who admitted to our hospital in a state of acute respiratory failure, echocardiography revealed an acute right heart syndrome with a thrombus in the right atrium, computed tomography pulmonary angiogram revealed bilateral massive pulmonary embolism as well as Covid-19 pneumonia. He was treated with systemic thrombolysis using intravenous rt-PA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) with immediate clinical improvement and no hemorrhagic complications. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: In the presence of the SARs Cov-2 infection, several reports have indicated considerable procoagulant events, including life-threatening pulmonary embolism. There are still no current guidelines for the treatment of VTE in COVID-19 patients, but they are largely consistent with non-COVID-19 recommendations. Elderly patients are considered to be at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications, and also and above all are vulnerable to bleeding complications from anticoagulant treatments. CONCLUSION: This case highlight the importance of considering thromboembolic complications despite the severity of the associated SARS-cov-2 pneumonia and the role of prophylactic anticoagulation for Covid-19 patients hospitalized or not.

Incidental diagnosis of a large cardiac thrombus swinging through an interatrial communication in a COVID-19 patient: Case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The hypercoagulability state induced by COVID-19 has been well established and various forms of subsequent thromboembolic events have been reported throughout literature including multiple cases of intracardiac thrombi, four of which in our center alone, this case being the fifth. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 38-year-old male with no prior cardiovascular history who -subsequently to a COVID-19 infection-developped a right atrial thrombosis associated to a pulmonary embolism, and in whom cardiography revealed an interatrial communication. Management relied upon curative doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with favourable outcome. DISCUSSION: In our discussion, we lay out the various physiopathological mechanisms incriminated throughout literature in the genesis of a hypercoagulability state distinctive of COVID-19, before highlighting the incidence of an interatrial communication (whether a Potent Foramen Ovale or Atrial Septal Defect) discovered in patients with COVID-19, and the potential paradoxical embolization risks they imply as well as reported cases. A mention of hemostatic parameters monitored was also warranted. Finally we discuss the guidelines in terms of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in hospitalized patients before discussing cardiac thrombosis's therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: Our case highlights various key points which could change the prognosis of COVID-19 patients, whether related to the underdiagnosis of interatrial abnormalities or with regards to the diagnosis to thromboembolic events, but also the indisputable place of anticoagulation in COVID-19 management.

Brainstem stroke: A fatal thromboembolic event after new onset atrial fibrillation during covid-19 infection: A case report and literature review.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disease is a serious pandemic that put the world on an exceptional sanitary alert. It is a multifaceted disease, since it can affect the lung, the cardiovascular system and the central nervous system at the same time. A 66-year-old man, diabetic, hypertensive, admitted to the emergency room for medical management of acute dyspnea, diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. The evolution is marked by respiratory distress as well as new onset atrial fibrillation and a severe ischemic stroke of the brainstem. COVID-19 disease is associated with very serious thromboembolic complications of high incidence, and this is explained by the coagulopathy secondary to the alteration of the microcirculation after the hyper-inflammatory state. Ischemic stroke is one of these complications. The occurrence of new onset atrial fibrillation during COVID-19 infection makes the incidence of ischemic stroke very high and the prognosis more severe. The treatment is mainly based on antithrombotic therapy. Thromboembolic complications remain a real problem to manage in COVID-19 patients given the several mechanisms that promote this situation.

D-dimer Level and Diabetes in the COVID-19 Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is the most common of comorbidity in patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia. Coagulation abnormalities with D-dimer levels are increased in this disease. OBJECTIFS: We aimed to compare the levels of D-dimer in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with COVID 19. A link between D-dimer and mortality has also been established. MATERIALS: A retrospective study was carried out at the University Hospital Center of Oujda (Morocco) from November 01st to December 01st, 2020. Our study population was divided into two groups: a diabetic group and a second group without diabetes to compare clinical and biological characteristics between the two groups. In addition, the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the optimal D-dimer cut-off point for predicting mortality in diabetics. RESULTS: 201 confirmed-COVID-19-patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 (IQR 56-73), and 56% were male. Our study found that D-dimer levels were statistically higher in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients. (1745 vs 845 respectively, P = 0001). D-dimer level > 2885 ng/mL was a significant predictor of mortality in diabetic patients with a sensitivity of 71,4% and a specificity of 70,7%. CONCLUSION: Our study found that diabetics with COVID-19 are likely to develop hypercoagulation with a poor prognosis.

Myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest revealing SARS-COV-2 infection: Case report.

INTRODUCTION: COVID19 infection is most often reveled by pulmonary symptoms, however cardiovascular manifestations has been observed revealing this infection with absence of respiratory symptoms. CLINICAL CASE: A 62 year old female patient, with no medical history, admitted to the emergency room for epigastric pain, with no respiratory signs, the exploration revealed myocardial infarction with COVID 19 infection. CONCLUSION: COVID19 infection manifest mainly with respiratory symptoms but it can also be revealed by cardiac manifestations with absence of respiratory symptoms.Physicians must be aware of these atypical manifestations and act accordingly to isolate patients to limit the spread of this disease.

Multiple cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 infection in a young patient: a case report.

COVID-19 infection is responsible for many complications, which can lead to a high risk of mortality in some patients. Among them are cardiovascular complications which are classified as the most severe. We report a case of a young woman, with no relevant pathological history, admitted for COVID-19 infection, complicated by myocarditis with severe ventricular dysfunction, cardiogenic shock and a large thrombosis into the left ventricle (LV) that was responsible for a left lower limb ischemia associated with a deep venous thrombosis of right lower limb.

Cardiovascular injuries during COVID-19 infection: A PROCESS-compliant case series from the Eastern Morocco.

BACKGROUND: To date, more than 105,805,951 cases of COVID-19 have been diagnosed including 2,312,278 deaths. Many patients have cardiovascular risk-factors and/or co-morbidities and a lot of them developed de novo heart conditions during the active or the post-infectious phase of the infection. A number of studies tried to demonstrate an association between poor prognostic outcomes and cardiovascular comorbidities and related damages, but the quality of current evidence is still weak. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of this single-center report is to describe the prevalence of cardiac injuries among our COVID-19 patients, to explore their association with survival outcomes and to demonstrate the medical care provided in our real-world setting. Our study included 610 COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of our university hospital of whom13.77% (n = 84) presented cardiovascular injuries and which we included in this case series. RESULTS: The average age of our patients was 65 years (27-90). 60 were men (71.42%) while 24 were women (28.55%). Their average BMI was 29.7 kg/m2. Among them, 50 had a pulmonary embolism (59.52%), 12 patients had a myocardial infarction (14.28%), 10 presented pericarditis (11.9%) and 3 developed myocarditis (3.57%). There were 6 cases of ischemia (7.14%), 2 cases of stroke (2.38%), and 1 case of decompensated heart failure (1.19%). Among our patients, 46.42% had diabetes, 32.14% had a high blood pressure, 13.09% had a chronic renal failure and 14.28% had a history of ischemic heart disease. 14 patients (16.66%) had an elevated troponin with higher levels than 1000 ng/mL. The D-dimer value was high in almost all patients (80.95%). Lung damage from COVID-19 was extensive in 27.38%, severe in 32.14%, and critical in 40.47% of enrolled cases. CT chest angiography, ECG, and cardiac ultrasound were performed to the paraclinical confirmatory exploration of cardiac damages of these patients. Medical care was based on isolation, azithromycin, vitamin C, zinc, vitamin D, salicylic acid, dexamethasone followed with methylprednisolone, and anticoagulation for all hospitalized patients. Tocilizumab was indicated for 17 patients with hyperferritinemia (20.23% of patients). The initial respiratory care of our patients required oxygen therapy using nasal cannula (7.14%) high concentration masks (33.33%), high flow nasal cannula treatment (11.9%), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (5.95%), and mechanical ventilation (41.66%). Thrombolysis was performed in three subjects with myocardial infarction and 2 underwent angioplasty with placement of an active stent at the proximal interventricular anterior artery, which all were successful. Three massive pulmonary embolisms died despite adequate treatment. Colchicine and salicylic acid were administered for pericarditis cases. Thromboprophylaxis was indicated for all patients and was reinforced if a venous thrombotic episode was confirmed. Patients with limb ischemia underwent surgical treatment. Among the 84 patients included in our cohort, 34 (40.47%) died in intensive care unit and 50 (59.52%) had a favorable evolution. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular involvement during COVID-19 should not be neglected and are associated with severe outcomes.